tepples wrote:
Do you still have it in your sentbox? If so, and if you still want it public, could you PM it to me so that I can replace the extra-wide image in psyco's post that's not only difficult for people using smaller monitors (e.g. me) but completely inaccessible to people who use a screen reader (e.g. people who hook up wireless headphones and listen to forum posts)?
I find this whole thing pretty weird since outside drama itself doesn't concern nesdev, so a lot of it won't make sense and regulars here don't have any reason to read it. But since the public forums keep being used by the OP for these attacks, I guess a public discussion on these sorts of threads makes sense.
psycopathicteen wrote:
If it wasn't for your inflamatory PM, this thread wouldn't have ever existed in the first place.
No one forced you to post this thread. No one forced you to post any of the other threads you've made on this. That was your own conscious decision. Do you know what personal accountability is? The thing that gets me about this is that you've blamed others (not just me) in the past for drama that you instigated yourself and that was years ago. I've only remembered it after reading that quote...
Also, if that PM is inflammatory, keeping in mind I made an effort to make all my criticism constructive, then what do you call this thread you posted? What do you call the other threads on nesdev where you went as far as to
create imaginary scenarios to discredit people? You're not in a position to make these sorts of judgement calls.
ccovell's right. No one else cares about this. That's why I sent a private message instead of cluttering up nesdev like you've done so here and elsewhere. The whole 'fishing for respect' thing while trying to discredit others is beyond pathetic, seriously. You've brought the drama into nesdev numerous times so that pretty much means you're also making this nesdev's problem, not just ours. Why do you think it's OK for this forum to be polluted with this sort of thing just so you can "win" at something so trivial?
tepples, Kasumi and ccovell make a number of valid points here and the post you quoted from SMWC was also addressed in a few points in my PM if you read it. Please don't ignore them.