Originally posted by: GPX
I think it's a fair call to the OP if you have limited time, then nothing wrong with trying different games/franchise. I particularly find I have no interest in RPGs these days simply because I don't have the time, what with work and family commitments etc.
The last Zelda I played and finished was Wind Waker on GameCube. Bloody good fun! Alas, no time to play out the modern versions of Zelda, apart from several hours of game time on Twilight Princess and Phantom Hourglass.
Though if you're genuinely a gamer and genuinely liking a game, the OP is basically saying "if I've played 1 Mario, Sonic, Grand Theft Auto, Devil May Cry, then I don't need to play any of the other prequels or sequels!"
That's like saying "all RPGs are the same anyway, so why play more than 1 RPG?"
Many of them are to me. If people are honest, BOTW is the same zelda formula, but in 3d and expansive. Mario is a little different for me, because with platformers, pretty much everything is different. The level designs and the mechanics can have a drastic affect on game play, so I'm not bored. But zelda and many rpgs are just very silimar. Zelda you basically look for keys defeat enemies, find the nightmare key, rince and repeat. Sure the puzzles are different, but not drastically. Zelda has a great formula, but once you play one version of that formula you've played them all.
That is why I am more interested in playing Adventures of Link, since it devianted from that formula.