Originally posted by: RockViper7
So. As my signature states, I just recently dove headfirst back into NES / retro game collecting after about a 10 year absense and one thing I've noticed that I keep wondering about is why everyone basically seems to ignore the unlicensed games.
It seems like they are basically just, well not ignored, but it seems like most people focus their collection on licensed only. Why is that?
For me personally, back when I was in my original NES heyday an NES game was an NES game.
I actually used to get pretty excited when I saw one of "them weird looking" games out in the wild. I didn't really care about whether or not it was licensed.
My dream is still to have a complete collection, wich includes all games.
Either way, I'm just curious. Thanks.
A few reasons.
The first one is deciding where to draw the line becomes an issue. There's 677 US released NTSC games that were licensed by Nintendo.
There's also lots of promotional, test and diagnostic cartridges that aren't necessarily games but are more of demos or just "software" for the NES. Most people aren't collecting Nintendo Repair Center carts.
Then there's unlicensed games that were sold within the US. Where people draw the line on this varies as some things like Cheetahmen II weren't available to purchase until long after the NES had passed its natural retail lifespan in the US. If you decide "Complete to me includes all the unlicensed games" you have to make your own decisions. Does Cheetahmen II count? What about homebrews that have been made in the past few years? What about foreign unlicensed carts like all the Sachen stuff? It becomes a very slippery slope and soon the goal of a "complete collection" becomes neverending. As a result most people stick with the 677.