Looking at the box art of Balloon Kid off this blog post, a question i've wondered a few times resurfaced.
Everything from this time has a special feel to it. The grainy, soft texture of gradients. The choice of colours. The sharp lines, fill-in fields; textured, gradiented, or clear.
I know similarily looking magazines from the same era often montaged components physically at a drawing desk, and the compositions were then shipped off to a repro film facility (often in south-east asia). The film was developed there (until quark Xpress cut that process short) and was then used for printing (i don't know the specific process, i began to work in the era of sending pdf:s to the printing shop)
Is this what's causing the grain? What tools and techniques might they have used, from drawing to print?
Everything from this time has a special feel to it. The grainy, soft texture of gradients. The choice of colours. The sharp lines, fill-in fields; textured, gradiented, or clear.
I know similarily looking magazines from the same era often montaged components physically at a drawing desk, and the compositions were then shipped off to a repro film facility (often in south-east asia). The film was developed there (until quark Xpress cut that process short) and was then used for printing (i don't know the specific process, i began to work in the era of sending pdf:s to the printing shop)
Is this what's causing the grain? What tools and techniques might they have used, from drawing to print?