Originally posted by: zi
oh no no no no no, my good wiz. these would be NA members only scores.
and as far as verification goes, there'd be a form where u submit yr score and attach a pic.
I know. I'm saying NA members that have been verified by TG can have their names put on the NA only list here. Instead of having to set up our own verification method, why not work in conjunction with someone who's already doing it anyway. Makes more sense to me, especially if the scores are to be trusted. Who's to say you didn't use, say, the invincibility code in Astyanax to get to the end without seeing a recording? And who's gonna watch everything in that case? It's just easier, more efficient, and better all around to have them do the work. This of course implies that they allow us to use the scores which, while technically data and not subject to copyright law, would still be a courtesy to them for actually doing the work. Not to mention that it removes conflict-of-interest when one of the people running the list wants to get a score up there. If I'm doing the verification, who is going to verify MY scores?
-------------------------
"It's always amazing to me how some of the most worthless games from a gaming perspective tend to fetch outrageous amounts of money. But then again, it could be said that something is only worth what someone is willing to pay for it. I'm curious if the high bidder of the $873.04 Stadium Events (cart-only) realizes that it's nowhere nearly as rare as about 20+ games I can think of that sell for 1/10th that amount? At any rate, I wanted to draw attention to this trend: if people say it's rare, it must be true, and therefore it must be had at any price."
-Dain Anderson, October 14, 2006
Originally posted by: kryptk33p3r
im used to dick jokes i get to see one everytime I pee
).
