Well, Ichinisan did talk to the guys at some SportsCast podcast after I responded to a tweet I couldn't even read.
Also, to get it started we emailed the video link to Kotaku's Luke Plunkett and he did ask these questions in his first reply:
"Is there anything else you're able to tell us about the incident? Like: Who exactly did you buy it from? How much did you pay for the games?" We didn’t reach out to anyone else before it went viral.
His only other question before it went live was "did they indicate what the drugs were?" but I didn't get to respond to that until after it went live.
He didn't do so bad. I can see where other reports like NintendoLife got the idea that we didn't know until we got home, but Kotaku didn't actually say that. They initially linked the wrong YouTube channel ("CZroe") but they fixed that. There were a couple issues though.
Luke implies that Newnan PD investigated the flea market when, in fact, that would be Carrollton or Carroll County's jurisdiction. Furthermore, there is no sign that anyone has been there to check out the vendor... except the random people who saw this and are now combing his shelves for NES Golf.
Maybe the police have visited him and he was told not to tell anyone much like I was told at first, but that means Kotaku shouldn't know about it either.
My biggest issue is where he claims that "it was clear that it wasn't a fresh transaction." There is literally nothing to indicate that it wasn't intercepted and stolen off someone's porch the day before. This caused a lot of other articles to make similar statements with some out-right saying that it's been in there since the '80s. Uhh, PAL Isolated Warrior and PAL Rollergames we're both released in 1991.
One of the officers did say "who knows how long that's been in there" but it wasn't as if to say that it had "clearly" been in there a long time. It was just acknowledging the possibility that it's been i there a long time. Even then, "a long time" could mean since Silk Road/Bitcoin exchanges started several years ago or it could mean 25 years ago. Kotaku implied that seemingly to support the facetious scenario they added to the end (a joke). I guess that's not too different from Jimmy Fallon changing the contents to "weed" in order to make a 4:20 joke on 4-20, but most other places reporting on it took that idea and ran with it.
Despite their reputation and the fact that they never contacted us, NY Post seems to have the most accurate report of all. They actually watched ALL of the videos themselves, disregarded anything added by other news reports, independently obtained the police report, and only added information from the police report (police description of the substance inside). I didn't notice any assumptions, wild conjecture, distortions, or editorialization.
I consider it a good thing that they never contacted us, since I can point to their independent research as confirmation for any of the doubters. They actually watched the full police visit video and relied on quotes from the officer where they call it "drugs" instead of taking my word for it. They relied heavily on quotes, correctly attributing the identification of "heroin" to the "anonymous experts" I attributed it to. They did not imply that it was old or that we weren't expecting to find something like that inside. No wild assumptions about where it came from or how it happened.
So many other articles and YouTube commentaries create contradictions by implying things that we never said. So many times we've found someone screaming "fake!" with their only evidence being a contradiction that was manufactured by someone else's report.
Tipster, for example, read NintendoLife's aritcle and added his own explanations of collector behavior, but somehow managed to make it worse (NintendoLife's story was already pretty inaccurate)! He suggested that we were probably "just getting started" with NES collecting and said we bought the games because we didn't own them, even though his own video clearly shows that we already owned both! He then said we opened them "to verify the boards." Sure enough, someone called it "fake" since that would be a huge coincidence to buy both games just because we didn't own them and find drugs inside both.
Of course the very premise of that is wrong. It wasn't a coincidence when we knew full well that there would be something interesting inside before we bought them and we only bought them to satisfy our curiosity. While talking about how collectors routinely open NES games to verify boards, he proudly displays Mighty Final Fight, a game even I don't own yet (Psst! Tipster! I'll trade ya DuckTales 2...). Of all people, I'd expect a Mighty Final Fight owner who knows about verifying NES boards to know that it wouldn't make sense to open NES Golf for that reason. Looking for a Famicom adapter? Sure. "Verifying" a $0.50 game to avoid counterfeits? No way!
You almost can't help ending up with 10x copies of Golf if you collect NES. It is the most worthless game and seems to come with every bundle. I have a ton of copies because of my "any NES game is worth $1; even just for the shell" mantra, which means I got most of them for less than $1.
The only thing close to "an interview" was the SportsCast podcast.
While Jeremy Roth from CNN did contact us for permission to use the video in his report, he didn't ask any questions. He report was passed on to multiple local news programs across the country and they all said what he wrote almost verbatim, like one of those John Oliver bits (guess it isn't just conservative news that does this, John
). The only major error there was when he says "Newnan police...said it appeared the packages had been inside the games a very long time." Unless they contacted the police themselves (which they don't claim to have done), the police never said that. Because they cite the NY Post for some of what was said by the police I do not believe that CNN contacted Newnan PD themselves.
SyFy Wire asked if we could answer some questions but published before I responded. Actually, it seems my original response was lost and they couldn't wait forever. Regardless, they did get any answers from us before publishing.
This feels a bit like the Retro Roundtable "reviewing reviews" of the Analogue Super Nt.