Originally posted by: Tanooki
I think the violent dog list is pure bullshit simply put.
It's not violent dogs, it should be a violent and/or dumbass owner list.
Rotties, pits, and the rest are not violent by nature, they're trained or abused into being pure killing machine bastards by the losers that own or dominate over them.
Some dogs though in general aren't fans of others, same with people, sometimes it's a big vs small issue, or well perhaps that dog for whatever reason hates the other, just like people. They do break up dogs at some dog parks by size just so the big ones won't dominate a small one or step on it and crush it on accident.
Violent dog breeds are as stupid as violent gun lists...it's the people behind them. Personally the most violent dogs I've come across are poorly trained small dogs. They get this tiny penis syndrome thing going on and they'll lunge out and attack anything bigger as they're intimidated and scared. I only know one pit, but it's a big dumb playful big old wuss I'd be fine having my baby around.
I don't think it's entirely bullshit,
They certainly aren't violent "by nature", they are violent on purpose. They are bred that way, those same asshole just went searching for the most violent dogs they could find and bred them for ages to produce dogs that are most suitable as attack dogs and fighting dogs. That includes their brain development as well as the body development.
Dogs differ a lot depending on the breed and some breeds are trickier to handle properly (on average) than others. Every dog is still unique of course, it's not like certain breeds are always violent or unpredictable or anything. There are no absolutes, only tendencies.
Personally I find it's the ones that are bred for beauty that I'm always leary about because they have those narrow heads (with no brain room) and they often seem to be prone to unpredictable behavior in my experience.
I still think this factor is far less important compared to the owners though.