Originally posted by: BRNexus
Makes me sad that there still isn't any new palettes. I mean is it technically very complicated to add Palettes or even add a palette loader in the Scoreboard program? Again, the FBX palette in the AVS is out of date. He's had like 3+ revisions of that palette since. Then of course there are other cool Palettes like Wavebeam. I wished we got some kind of confirmation that its planned for a future firmware just so I don't have to guess anymore.
Again, maybe I underestimate what it takes to add palettes while creating a new firmware, but it seems like such a small request that could have been implemented by now.
If all you did was add wavebeam and FBX's Smooth palettes it will be greatly appreciated by many people.
The problem is every update, no matter how small or insignificant we think it might be, has the possibility to introduce another, unwanted change to something else in the firmware. As such, any changes, even if swapping out or updating palettes, has to be carefully weighed out in regard to implementation, testing, etc. There's also the issue of how much space is remaining on the FPGA and how much of that bunnyboy wants to leave open for possible bugfixes or future feature implementation. If he uses all of that up no implementing a handful of palettes that, looking at those who are actually saying anything about it, only a handful, at most, would really go nuts over, he either loses the space/ability to implement future fixes and features or inevitably has to deal with all of the ranting and bitching at whichever palettes he axes to get those fixes/features implemented.
It's a balancing act. If there's enough call for palettes (and 1080p, etc.), enough people will get vocal enough that bunnyboy will get the picture. If that happens, I'd guess he might entertain the possibility of an "AVS 2.0" which uses the bigger FPGA he's discussed previously, which will immediately boost the cost of the system...but add additional space for things like 1080p support, tons of palettes, etc. The issue of bugs occuring via implementation would still loom, but at least then there'd be plenty of room to do it.