Originally posted by: guillavoie
I'm wondering if adjusting the point value of some of these events would have been a good idea. Like multiplying X10 the frisbee score to make it worthwhile in the whole portrait.
Too late
(and you'd need to multiply frisbee by 100x to make it matter, I think... even then, it is a fairly "binary" event of success/fail)
And it is tough to say what "good" is going to look like on the other games, anyway.
Yes, a "good" score on skating is probably still only going to be 2 or 3 BMX tricks.
But half pipe, footbag, and BMX all have real value (though only footbag and BMX can break 100k, and BMX may be able to do WAY more than that... tough to tell at this point in the competition)
I think, if anything, it should have been exclusively a footbag or BMX competition, with the logic being that:
(1) skating and frisbee are "throw aways" in terms of being worthless
(2) half pipe is a "throw away" in terms of point differentiation... 20-21k is easy and repeatable, and it's not clear you can do a whole lot better on that one, anyway... so all it does is shift everybody's total score by 20k.
Footbag takes some real practice and creativity to get a good variety going with minimal wasted time and a few of the tricks are pretty tough to do, so that sets up break points in the scoring.
BMX is an interesting beast. I feel like I've figured out a scoring method that is highly valueable AND repeatable, it is just a matter of me learning the course to be able to stretch it out.