Originally posted by: B.A.
Originally posted by: fox
Kurt Angle was brought back to put over new talent. He lost to Drew, he lost to Corbin, and well has been losing a lot. They did give him some fun things to do like his match with Chad Gable a few weeks back, but Kurt's latest run was never about an old man coming back and showing those young whipersnappers a thing a two.
Kind of nice for a change, instead of the usual booking of the part time nostalgia acts, who just show up and pants the current roster, making the new guys look like geeks in order to have an excuse to run a bunch of clips that say "Remember the Attitude Era?"
I get the whole make the new guy look good on your way out, the problem is no one gives a shit about Baron Corbin. The dude rassle's in in corporate casual attire FFS! Before announcing who Angle's final match would be WWE did a vote for like 4 guys (Corbin, Cena were one there, can't remember who else), Corbin was by far the least popular choice. They announce Corbin anyway and the fans reaction was HUGELY negative and news was that WWE was surprised by that?!? Seriously?
John Cena shits all over the match on social media, Kurt Angle himself even comes out and says he had hoped for someone better for his farewell match. Most fans assume WWE has to have something up their sleeve, they couldn't be that dense...nope that was it. The storytelling was just plain bad.
Kind of nice to shit all over a former champion, olympic gold medalist, and one of the best technical wrestlers of all time? He could have at least lost to someone like AJ Styles, or Shelton Benjamin and "pass the torch". At least have him lose to a good technical wrestler after a decent match...
People legitimately dislike Corbin, not sure this is going to help him either.
I completely agree about the Kurt Angle "farewell" match with BA.
It was so effing WEIRD and really nonsensical. I was on the Cena train.... But overall, I thought it was very very strange. Having him lose? Then not even have Corbin capitalize on it on Raw??? Very very confusing.
Mania:
I liked it, but it really was far too long.
If you watch the pre-show, which I did... I was watching wrestling from 3-10:30.... it was insane.
I fell asleep multiple times.
And WWE killed the crowd by having so many babyfaces win. Darktone wondered how the hell they could have Seth, Kofi, AND Becky all win in one night.... well, they added Tony Nese, Major Brothers, AND Finn Balor (+ IIconics)... it was FAR FAR too much.
Should have had The Revival win and save that title change for Raw. Balor could have won on RAW too for that matter. I mean, the crowd was still into the main event, but they weren't biting on the false finishes or anything.
I think they were burnt out.
But I rewatched it Monday morning (all three main title matches) and I enjoyed them all. Fuck, Becky is hot. Plus, she's been cutting incredible promo's and dominating EVERYONE on Twitter (which now counts because wrestlers get to be "on" 24/7). Looking forward to more from her, but I really wish WWE would step it up and not have her get in scuffles (unless she is the decisive winner) with "new" superstars randomly and start absolutely crushing everyone. But Becky has since taken the interaction to a whole new level on Twitter and now I care.
Wrestlemania: Good god, a 2 hour pre-show really puts it out there, time-wise. How about a 1 hour pre-show and 4 hour PPV?
5 hours? I never thought I'd see that as a compromise.
When I was in highschool buying PPVs... did they not start at 8PM ET, and run until 11? And they were usually done at like 10:45....? Because they never could go over.
Now that WWE has The NEtwork they can do whateverr the fuck they want. But damn... almost 8 hours. Yowza.
I'm shocked. I'm trying to figure out how the hell it took so long. Joe vs. Rey was less than a minute, and The Universal title match was 8-10 minutes, including chaos? Whelp... I napped.