Originally posted by: the_wizard_666
Originally posted by: Tulpa
Originally posted by: the_wizard_666
I'm NOT okay with people saying they have a full set when they don't. Saying you have a full set, even with qualifiers, is saying that you've got everything there is to get. That is NOT the case. Saying you have a full set should mean literally that - that you have a fully complete set of everything you can get. When you add qualifiers to the mix, you're basically just saying "I have everything I want to pursue." So say that! Don't start telling people you have a full set when it's obvious to anyone that you don't. Set your collecting goals and achieve them, just don't try to bullshit your way into making it sound like a bigger deal than it truly is.
What defines a full set? Anything that works in an NES? No one can ever have that full set.
Yes, that's what defines a full set. And yes, it's virtually impossible. Nobody will ever have that set, just like nobody will ever have a complete Atari set. The entire term "full set" with regard to collecting should really never be used. You can have everything you're actively pursuing. You can have everything for a given subset, but you will NEVER own it all. I mentioned it in terms of comic collecting earlier - you can have a full run of a comic, you can have every appearance of a character, but it's impossible to have all the comics, so a "full set" or "complete set" (whatever terminology is preferred) is entirely unattainable. It doesn't mean you shouldn't try for it, or set limits for yourself, but you can't say you have everything when you truly don't.
Well, there are defined sets within the full set, and that's primarily of interest to collectors to create their goals.
A "full licensed North American set" is obtainable. As is a "full licensed PAL region set (A or B or both.)" The "unlicensed set" has some debate (primarily regarding the Sachens), and you have the test carts, protos, and competition carts, but most collectors do have a definite set in mind when they collect.
A "full set" is an academic exercise, IMO, since it
is impossible. For the lesser "full" sets, it becomes an argument in semantics. To list all the qualifiers is often a mouthful, so people use shorthand.
IMO, Bunnyboy put it best.
Originally posted by: bunnyboy
Originally posted by: fcgamer
actual full set enthusiasts.
Those do not exist. Nobody has anywhere near the actual full set of every NES cart, and nobody ever will because there are too many one off carts. Everyone who says full set means their own limited version of full.