Thanks Greg, here's the direct URL: The Evolution of the Action 52
Just because I do not necessarily agree with your article's conclusions does not give you the right to be a dick. Sarcasm is not very becoming of you, me thinks.
We can all have our own opinions, and I have no problem with that. Regarding something that happened about 20 years ago or so, it is hard to say what the truth of the matter is on the above game cartridge, we will probably never know the truth for sure. I do have a problem with the writer of the article responding to my theories in a sarcastic/condenscending manner, especially when I had spoken with one of the Active guys myself! Now whether the man I spoke with was being honest, I couldn't tell you, and whether you guys believe that I spoke with anyone from that company or not, is really your call (though considering all of the other interviews I conducted with people, I am sure this really won't be much of an issue). That being said, if the author of the article is gonna act like a dick when I provide a bit of input, based on a conversation I had, then I feel fully justified to call him out on it, even if it is acting like a dick in return. Sorry, but it's a two way street.