Originally posted by: coffeewithmrsaturn
Originally posted by: bootload
I don't understand how you would think it would work any other way. If you ship something and it doesn't arrive, USPS reimburses you for the insurance. If you choose not to insure it, then that's on you, not anyone else.
Consider the situation where it was insured, USPS reimburses you and eBay has to pay the buyer out of their own pocket (as you suggested). So the buyer paid nothing, the seller paid nothing and eBay paid for the whole thing. What kind of terrible business strategy is that?
I see what you're saying, but to me that is them assuming risk as part of running a marketplace. It reassures sellers that they are safe to do business there. I'm not saying I'm outraged that that isn't how it works, but it did surprise me.
Also, I had something happen once where PayPal did foot the bill so that neither buyer nor seller were out. I don't remember the situation exactly, but that precedent was in my mind.
Not if they're not in control of which shipping method you use. What if you used a local courior instead of USPS? What if you used a carrier pigeon? What if you set it sail down the river? I know USPS is pretty reliable but if you choose a shipping method that fails, that was your choosing. Until we allow eBay to tell us which shipping method we can use, they're going to deny responisbility.
Also, PayPal isn't the one running a business here, you are. They're merely providing a storefront for you to set up your business. If you had a similar situation happen with a retail store, would you expect your landlord to pay for the mistake because he owned the storefront property? No, you're the business owner, not eBay.
Also, spoiler alert, USPS isn't reliable.