NintendoAge

Should Stan's comic be published in future ezines?

Zzap — 2008-11-29T01:27:11 -05.00

I think you guys will dig the next one. It's a two-pager about Bronty and I think it's pretty hilarious, he seemed to like the idea too. Hope you enjoy.

Should Stan's comic be published in future ezines?

Zzap — 2008-11-28T06:40:33 -05.00

Stan comic is funny and i think it should stay in there.

Should Stan's comic be published in future ezines?

Zzap — 2008-11-26T00:08:42 -05.00

Originally posted by: Dr. Morbis

Originally posted by: Parpunk

In fact i think im a genious rat...

-Mark

You spelled genius wrong...

lol hey man it was late and a long day of work. you got me though lol...........

jerk lol

Should Stan's comic be published in future ezines?

Zzap — 2008-11-18T09:18:42 -05.00

Seeing this thread revived makes me glad his comic didn't get scrapped. Faegly was, in my opinion, the only part of the last e-zine that was interesting to me. Sorry guys, alot of good work, but nothing really of interest to me.

Should Stan's comic be published in future ezines?

Zzap — 2008-11-18T05:33:41 -05.00

Morbis made me rofl

Should Stan's comic be published in future ezines?

Zzap — 2008-11-17T21:46:55 -05.00

Originally posted by: Parpunk

In fact i think im a genious rat...

-Mark

You spelled genius wrong...

Should Stan's comic be published in future ezines?

Zzap — 2008-11-14T21:49:33 -05.00

Originally posted by: MrMark0673

Originally posted by: bunnyboy

Originally posted by: MrMark0673

He's made fun of variant collectors as well,

Group of people, not a personal attack.

Originally posted by: MrMark0673

he portrayed ParPunk as a Giant Rat. Mark didn't piss and moan about it if I remember correctly, I could be mistaken though.

Which issue was that?

Issue number three, the ENTIRE thing was directed toward Mark and how he planned on selling his collection a market value and then buying it back at market value. Again, I could be completely mistaken, but I NEVER heard Mark complain about that at all. How is that any different?

i never complained about it or commented on it because i never knew anything about it until tonight LOL man where the heck was i in September!!!! lol but anyways so i was a RAT?? nice lol! thats pretty funny really, i still dont understand about selling off collection cause all i did was downsize, and then bought some carts back at WAAAAAAAAY lower prices than what i sold the Cibs for. In fact i think im a genious rat, mainly because i sold off my rare boxes before this econmoy crisis got real bad and now i can scoop up all the carts i sold off for way less cash than what i sold them for a year ago lol. Smart rat :-)

Sorry to ressurect old threads but man i totally missed the boat on these topics, i guess i need to start exploring more threads than just collectors corner, auction spotlight, and BST lol. thanks guys

-Mark

Should Stan's comic be published in future ezines?

Zzap — 2008-09-08T16:45:54 -05.00

Hmm. It's pretty wild to see such a divided issue. Pulling it outright would be pretty severe. I maintain that it doesn't really 'mesh' with the eZine at large in terms of tone and all, but that's admittedly a very outside perspective on the whole thing, and this all probably makes a lot more sense to community insiders.

Should Stan's comic be published in future ezines?

Zzap — 2008-09-07T10:48:38 -05.00

Well, I guess this lame idea was dead the second before it was even put in the water! Ha (to quote Spooky)! Thanks for the support and hatred!

Should Stan's comic be published in future ezines?

Zzap — 2008-09-03T02:19:46 -05.00

I vote keep it. I spoke out pretty loudly against it, but I wasn't trying to eliminate the comic or the e-zine, just the direct attack on a member of this site. The very personal nature of the comic by the use of a real name and screename was just out of line. Beyond that, I have no complaints.